Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hydrogel dressings are gaining increased clinical acceptance as a wound management modality. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of three amorphous hydrogels with occlusive, control treatment (Tegaderm) on healing of experimental wounds. Eight partial-thickness cutaneous wounds (2.5 cm x 2.5 cm x 0.04 cm) were made, using an electrokeratome, and the four treatments were allocated by randomisation within a cephalad and a caudal region on each of six 60-kg domestic pigs. In total, twelve wounds were each treated with 2.0 ml of each type of hydrogel--an experimental amorphous hydrogel ("Exgel"), IntraSite Gel and a poloxamer gel containing 3% hydrogen peroxide--and covered with Tegaderm, or treated with Tegaderm alone. At 66 h post-operatively, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of wounds were hematoxylin-eosin-stained and assessed morphometrically for epithelium coverage in a blinded fashion. The Exgel remained macroscopically intact on the wounds in contrast to the other hydrogels, which had dissolved completely after treatment. Exgel significantly (p < 0.05) increased epithelial coverage of the wounds, compared with the other treatments (by 20% more than Tegaderm-treated wounds). In vitro experiments indicated that the polymeric matrix of Exgel sequesters bioactive molecules present in wound fluid and that it may in vivo act as a protective reservoir that delivers bioactive molecules at a rate that promotes epithelial migration. Exgel may represent a new treatment principle to promote wound healing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnus S. Ågren (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: