Key result
Single-dose fimasartan yields ~73% higher drug exposure in renal impairment versus healthy controls.
Why the study?
The effect of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of fimasartan in patients with renal impairment compared to healthy volunteers was evaluated based on FDA guidance.
Does severe renal impairment affect the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of fimasartan compared to healthy volunteers?
Does severe renal impairment affect the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of fimasartan compared to healthy volunteers?
Effect estimate: geometric mean ratios of 1.87 and 1.73
Fimasartan exposure is significantly increased in patients with severe renal impairment due to increased relative bioavailability.
Higher fimasartan exposure in severe renal impairment warrants dosing caution; leaves open need for adjustment pending dedicated trials.
BACKGROUND: Fimasartan is a novel angiotensin II receptor blocker. Fimasartan is mainly eliminated via biliary excretion, and its urinary elimination is less than 3%. OBJECTIVE: Based on guidance from the United States Food and Drug Administration, a reduced pharmacokinetic (PK) study was conducted to evaluate the effect of renal function on the PK of fimasartan in patients with renal impairment and healthy volunteers. METHODS: A single centre, single-dose, open-label, healthy volunteer controlled trial was conducted in patients with renal impairment (RI) (estimated glomerular filtration rate lower than 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and age-, weight- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (estimated glomerular filtration rate higher than 90 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). All participants received a single oral dose of fimasartan 120 mg, after which serial blood sampling for PK evaluation was conducted. Noncompartmental PK analysis of fimasartan was performed. A mixed-effects model approach was used to identify significant covariates and PK parameters. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects were enrolled (8 healthy volunteers and 8 RI patients). The maximum plasma concentrations and areas under the plasma concentration curves of the RI patients were higher than those of the healthy volunteers, with geometric mean ratios of 1.87 and 1.73, respectively. The relative bioavailability of fimasartan from the population PK analysis was 77% higher in the RI patients than in the healthy volunteers. CONCLUSION: The increased drug exposure of fimasartan in RI patients was explained by the increased relative bioavailability. This result can be explained from our knowledge concerning alterations in PK related to renal function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2014) studied Renal impairment (n=16). Fimasartan vs. Healthy volunteers was evaluated on Maximum plasma concentrations and areas under the plasma concentration curves (geometric mean ratios of 1.87 and 1.73). A single 120 mg dose of fimasartan in patients with renal impairment resulted in higher maximum plasma concentrations and AUCs compared to healthy volunteers (geometric mean ratios 1.87 and 1.73).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: