Key result
DAPT is linked to a ~5-fold increase in EVD-associated hemorrhage in aSAH patients.
Why the study?
The association between dual antiplatelet therapy and hemorrhagic complications following external ventricular drain placement in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients was unclear.
Does DAPT increase the risk of hemorrhage associated with EVD placement in patients with aSAH?
Cohort (n=298)
Does DAPT increase the risk of hemorrhage associated with EVD placement in patients with aSAH?
Odds Ratio: 4.92 (95% CI 2.45–9.91)
Absolute Event Rate: 26.7% vs 5.6%
p-value: p=.0001
In patients with aSAH requiring EVD placement, DAPT for stenting or flow diversion increases the risk of radiographic hemorrhage but not symptomatic hemorrhage.
DAPT was associated with radiographic but not symptomatic EVD hemorrhage in aSAH; leaves open optimal timing and protocols for prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Stenting and flow diversion for aneurysmal sub arachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) require the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether DAPT is associated with hemorrhagic complication following placement of external ventricular drains (EVD) in patients with aSAH. METHODS: Rates of radiographically identified hemorrhage associated with EVD placement were compared between patients who received DAPT for stenting or flow diversion, and patients who underwent microsurgical clipping or coiling and did not receive DAPT by way of a backward stepwise multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-three patients were admitted for aSAH management. Two hundred ninety-eight patients required placement of an EVD. One hundred twenty patients (40%) were treated with stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion and required DAPT, while 178 patients (60%) were treated with coiling without stents or microsurgical clipping and did not receive DAPT. Forty-two (14%) cases of new hemorrhage along the EVD catheter were identified radiographically. Thirty-two of these hemorrhages occurred in patients on DAPT, while 10 occurred in patients without DAPT. After multivariate analysis, DAPT was significantly associated with radiographic hemorrhage [odds ratio: 4.92, 95% confidence interval: 2.45-9.91, P = .0001]. We did not observe an increased proportion of symptomatic hemorrhage in patients receiving DAPT (10 of 32 [31%]) vs those without (5 of 10 [50%]; P = .4508). CONCLUSION: Patients with aSAH who receive stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion are at higher risk for radiographic hemorrhage associated with EVD placement. The timing between EVD placement and DAPT initiation does not appear to be of clinical significance. Stenting and flow diversion remain viable options for aSAH patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hudson et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) requiring external ventricular drain (EVD) (n=298). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. No DAPT was evaluated on Radiographically identified hemorrhage associated with EVD placement (OR 4.92, 95% CI 2.45-9.91, p=.0001). Dual antiplatelet therapy in aSAH patients requiring EVD placement was significantly associated with increased radiographic hemorrhage compared to no DAPT (OR 4.92; 95% CI 2.45-9.91; P=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: