Luneburg's model for computation of the curvature K of visual two-dimensional space (horizontal visual surface) was tested with equidistant and parallel alleys in large open spaces. Forty-six subjects used stakes to produce 406 experimental alleys of variable sizes (from 5 x 1 to 240 m x 48m). The results show that, contrary to results obtained under laboratory conditions with small alleys and light spots, the individual curvature of visual space does not have negative constant value. K varies in the interval - 1 to + 1 in ninety computed settings: K greater than 0 (N = 38); K less than 0 (N = 52). Therefore the Lobachevskian gemetry currently attributed to visual space ought to be replaced by a Riemannian geometry of variable curvature. Moreover K is an individual function dependent on the size of the alley (distance from the subject), and visual perception would be better understood as scale-dependent. Independently of Luneburg's model we have tested the constancy of the curvature hypothesis in experiments with horopters and visual triangles. The results obtained invalidate Luneburg's hypothesis also.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Battro et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: