Key result
Surgical tray optimization cuts setup time ~23% for total-knee but not total-hip arthroplasty.
Why the study?
Optimizing surgical instrumentation may contribute to value-based care in commonly performed orthopedic procedures, but the impact of perioperative efficiency programs on operational measures was not well described.
Does surgical tray optimization reduce operating and processing time, cost, and waste in orthopedic surgery procedures?
Does surgical tray optimization reduce operating and processing time, cost, and waste in orthopedic surgery procedures?
Effect estimate: 23% reduction (6 minutes)
p-value: p=.01
Optimizing instrumentation trays for orthopedic procedures reduces processing time and cost, particularly for total knee arthroplasty.
Supports targeted tray optimization for TKA efficiency; leaves open effects on total OR time, costs, and generalizability to THA.
Optimizing surgical instrumentation may contribute to value-based care, particularly in commonly performed procedures. We report our experience in implementing a perioperative efficiency program in 2 types of orthopedic surgery (primary total-knee arthroplasty, TKA, and total-hip arthroplasty, THA).A comparative before-and-after study with 2 participating surgeons, each performing both THA and TKA, was conducted. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of surgical tray optimization on operating and processing time, cost, and waste associated with preparation, delivery, and staging of sterile surgical instruments. The study was designed as a prospective quality improvement initiative with pre- and postimplementation operational measures and a provider satisfaction survey.A total of 96 procedures (38 preimplementation and 58 postimplementation) were assessed using time-stamped performance endpoints. The number and weight of trays and instruments processed were reduced substantially after the optimization intervention, particularly for TKA. Setup time was reduced by 23% (6 minutes, P = .01) for TKA procedures but did not differ for THA. The number of survey respondents was small, but satisfaction was high overall among personnel involved in implementation.Optimizing instrumentation trays for orthopedic procedures yielded reduction in processing time and cost. Future research should evaluate patient outcomes and incremental/additive impact on institutional quality measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capra et al. (2019) studied Primary total-knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total-hip arthroplasty (THA) (n=96). Surgical tray optimization (perioperative efficiency program) vs. Preimplementation (standard surgical trays) was evaluated on Operating and processing time, cost, and waste associated with preparation, delivery, and staging of sterile surgical instruments (23% reduction (6 minutes), p=.01). Surgical tray optimization reduced setup time by 23% (6 minutes, P = .01) for total-knee arthroplasty procedures, but did not differ for total-hip arthroplasty.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: