Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and objective No previous study quantified the survival outcomes of second-look ureteroscopy (SU). We hypothesized that patients who underwent SU might exhibit better survival outcomes than their no-SU counterparts. Methods We relied on a multicenter retrospective database including 358 patients with UTUC treated conservatively between 2010 and 2021. Endpoints, namely overall survival (OS) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) rates, modeled as competing event for other-cause mortality (OCM), were quantified. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM), and OCM were also quantified according to SU. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology was used to assess OS. Landmark analysis for OS at 2 mo was also performed. Key findings Based on a median follow-up of 32 mo (interquartile range 16–56), 291 patients with UTUC were identified. Of those, 148 (51%) underwent SU. Median OS in patients who underwent SU was 103 versus 66 mo in patients without SU (D = 37 mo; p = 0.0024). RNU rates did not differ among the groups (24 vs 21%, p = 0.8). In IPTW-adjusted multivariable Cox regression models, adjusted number of lesions, tumor size, age, UTUC site, Charlson Comorbidity Index, high-grade, cytology, and ureteroscopy indication, SU patients were associated with higher OS rates compared to those without SU (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.37–0.94; p = 0.02). Within tumor ≤10 mm, four (3%) UTUC recurred in the first 9 mo of follow-up. Conclusions and clinical implications Within the current study, SU ensured an optimal clinical decision-making. Specifically, CSM and OCM rates of SU patients and their counterparts not receiving SU validated the patients with UTUC selection for conservative treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallioli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: