Key result
Aortic Biocor porcine bioprostheses are linked to ~22% higher absolute 9-year survival versus mitral placement.
Why the study?
Structural valve deterioration is the major cause of reoperation after bioprosthetic valve implantation, and mid-term durability data of Biocor porcine valves in different positions are needed.
Cohort (n=446)
Biocor porcine bioprostheses demonstrated excellent mid-term durability and low complication rates up to 9 years, with better survival observed in aortic versus mitral replacements.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biocor valves show acceptable intermediate durability in older patients; leaves open need for longer-term data versus contemporary options.
Background: Prosthetic cardiac valves have increased life expectancy of patients (pts) with valvular heart disease. Bioprosthetic complications required devices replacements within 10 years of implantation; structural valve deterioration (SVD) has emerged as the major cause of reoperation. We reviewed survival and prosthetic complications of Biocor porcine bioprostheses implanted in mitral, aortic and mitro-aortic position. Methods: Between January 1991 and January 2001 446 pts (192 males; 254 females; mean age 73.4±6.7 year, range 40–91) received 258 aortic, 138 mitral and 50 mitro-aortic Biocor porcine valves; of these 83 pts have previous different types of prosthetic devices (15 aortic, 53 mitral and 15 double). Concomitant cardiac procedures, namely myocardial revascularization, were performed in 91/446 pts (20.5%). All explanted bioprostheses (BPS) were available for pathologic investigation. Follow-up included 1319 pt.-years and was 98% complete with a median time of 36 pt.-months. Results: Perioperative mortality was 6.8% (30/446 pts; 12 aortic, 17 mitral and 1 double) and was mostly related to reoperations. At the end of follow-up 18.5% of pts died (77/416), 12 deaths were valve-related with freedom from valve related mortality of 94% at 9 years. Survival was 54% at 9 years. It was 63%, 41% and 62% for aortic, mitral and double valve replacement, respectively. At follow-up 87% of pts. were in NYHA I—II class and 13% were in III—IV class; 55% were in sinus rhythm, 36% in atrial fibrillation and 9% had a pace-maker. Eighty-five percent of pts were anticoagulated. There were 6 thromboembolic and 5 anticoagulant-related haemorrhagic episodes with no significant difference between aortic and mitral position ( p=0.7). The event freeedom was respectively 92% and 98.5% at 9 years. Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and non-SVD freedom were 96% and 93% at 9 years. SVD due to tissue degeneration, calcification and cusp's tears affected 2 pts with 94% freedom at 9 years. Overall freedom from all valve-related complications was 80% at 9 years and freedom from reoperation was 92% at 9 years. Conclusions: (1) Our intermediate-term follow-up of the Biocor porcine valve (BPS) showed excellent durability in all positions. (2) The aortic patients and especially the oldest group had better results than the mitral patients (41% vs. 63% 9 years survival, p=0.0004). (3) Higher mitral risk was related to higher prevalence of reoperations. (4) The incidence of anticoagulation-related complications is low in both aortic and mitral position without significant difference ( p=0.7). 4) A longer follow-up is required to get more information about SVD timing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bottio et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Valvular heart disease (n=446). Biocor porcine bioprostheses (aortic position) vs. Mitral position was evaluated on 9-year survival (p=0.0004). Patients receiving Biocor porcine bioprostheses in the aortic position had better 9-year survival compared to those in the mitral position.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: