Key result
Video-guided 12-second breathing shortens LEP latencies and reduces artifacts versus nature videos or classic protocols.
Why the study?
Preliminary evidence suggested that phase locking laser-evoked potentials with the breathing cycle can improve parameters used to evaluate LEPs.
Does a video-guided breathing instruction improve LEP testing parameters in healthy participants compared to watching a nature video or classic LEP methods?
Does a video-guided breathing instruction improve LEP testing parameters in healthy participants compared to watching a nature video or classic LEP methods?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A simple video-guided breathing protocol improves the quality and acceptability of laser-evoked potential testing.
Background: Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) constitute an objective clinical diagnostic method used to investigate the functioning of the nociceptor system, including signaling in thin peripheral nerve fibers: Aδ and C fibers. There is preliminary evidence that phase locking LEPs with the breathing cycle can improve the parameters used to evaluate LEPs. Methods: We tested a simple breathing protocol as a low-cost improvement to LEP testing of the hands. Twenty healthy participants all underwent three variants of LEP protocols: following a video-guided twelve-second breathing instruction, watching a nature video, or using the classic LEP method of focusing on the hand being stimulated. Results: The breath protocol produced significantly shorter latencies as compared with the nature or classic protocol. It was also the least prone to artifacts and was deemed most acceptable by the subjects. There was no difference between the protocols regarding LEP amplitudes. Conclusions: Using a breathing video can be a simple, low-cost improvement for LEP testing in research and clinical diagnostics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wold et al. (2022) studied Healthy (n=20). Video-guided twelve-second breathing instruction vs. Watching a nature video or classic LEP method was evaluated on LEP latencies. A video-guided twelve-second breathing instruction produced significantly shorter laser-evoked potential latencies and fewer artifacts compared with a nature video or classic protocol.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: