Key result
COPD nurse coordinator review linked to ~19-fold higher likelihood of pulmonary rehabilitation referral.
Why the study?
Pulmonary rehabilitation is recommended for COPD management, but implementation and referral rates appear to be low.
What is the frequency of referral to and attendance at pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in patients admitted to a tertiary hospital with COPD?
Cross-Sectional (n=88)
No
What is the frequency of referral to and attendance at pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in patients admitted to a tertiary hospital with COPD?
Odds Ratio: 18.7 (95% CI 3.8–91.4)
Despite guideline recommendations, implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD patients remains low, highlighting a gap in referral and attendance that can be improved by dedicated nurse coordinators.
Nurse coordinator review was associated with higher PR referral; hypothesis-generating for implementation trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in the management of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but implementation appears to be low. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of referral to, and attendance at, PR programmes in a sample of patients with COPD. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in South Australia, with a primary diagnosis of COPD between March and November 2011 was conducted. Data were collected from medical records and patient interview. RESULTS: From 235 admissions with preliminary coding as COPD, 88 patients had COPD as the primary reason for admission and were potentially eligible for rehabilitation. While 57% had been referred to rehabilitation during their disease course, only 18% had attended and completed at least half the programme. Seven patients had attended in the previous 2 years. Mean percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 42% at the time of referral. During the index admission, discussion of rehabilitation resulting in a referral occurred in 14 cases (16%). No demographic or disease characteristics were associated with referral/no referral; being reviewed by a COPD nurse coordinator during admission increased the likelihood of referral (odds ratio = 18.7, 95% confidence interval: 3.8-91.4). CONCLUSIONS: PR had been implemented in a small proportion of patients admitted to hospital with an exacerbation of COPD due to gaps in both referral to and subsequent attendance at a programme. Strategies to improve referral to and participation in PR are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnston et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=88). Review by a COPD nurse coordinator vs. No review by a COPD nurse coordinator was evaluated on Referral to pulmonary rehabilitation (OR 18.7, 95% CI 3.8-91.4). Review by a COPD nurse coordinator during hospital admission significantly increased the likelihood of referral to pulmonary rehabilitation (OR 18.7; 95% CI 3.8-91.4).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: