Simulation study reveals up to 44 percentage point operational cost reductions in canal drainage systems via stochastic control, highlighting the value of risk-aware pump scheduling.
This study presents an innovative approach to risk‐aware decision‐making in water resource management. We focus on a case study in the Netherlands, where risk awareness is key to water system design and policy‐making. Recognizing the limitations of deterministic methods in the face of weather, energy system, and market uncertainties, we propose a scalable stochastic Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework that integrates probabilistic forecasting, scenario generation, and stochastic optimal control. We utilize Combined Quantile Regression Deep Neural Networks and Non‐parametric Bayesian Networks to generate probabilistic scenarios that capture realistic temporal dependencies. The energy distance metric is applied to optimize scenario selection and generate scenario trees, ensuring computational feasibility without compromising decision quality. A key feature of our approach is the introduction of Exceedance Risk (ER) constraints, inspired by Conditional‐Value‐at‐Risk (CVaR), to enable more nuanced and risk‐aware decision‐making while maintaining computational efficiency. In this work, we enable the Noordzeekanaal–Amsterdam‐Rijnkanaal (NZK‐ARK) system to participate in Demand Response (DR) services by dynamically scheduling pumps to align with low hourly electricity prices on the Day Ahead and Intraday markets. Through historical simulations using real water system and electricity price data, we demonstrate that incorporating uncertainty can significantly reduce operational costs—by up to 44 percentage points compared to a deterministic approach—while maintaining safe water levels. The modular nature of the framework also makes it adaptable to a wide range of applications, including hydropower and battery storage systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heijden et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: