Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Recent advancements have aimed to optimize visualization and minimize insult to healthy cortical and subcortical tissue through the use of tubular-based retractors. OBJECTIVE: To investigate outcomes following resection of cerebral metastases using an integrated tubular retraction system with an exoscope and neuronavigation. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes in consecutive patients who underwent resection of a brain metastasis using a tubular retraction system and exoscope was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 61 yr (24-81 yr). Primary sources included lung (n = 13), breast (n = 3), renal cell (n = 3), and other (n = 6). Locations were frontal (n = 5), parietal (n = 8), cerebellar (n = 8), occipital (n = 3), and splenium (n = 1). Most lesions had a maximum diameter > 3.0 cm (n = 20) and a tumor depth > 4 cm (n = 14). Conversion to open (microscopic) craniotomy was not required in any case. Gross total resection was achieved in 20 cases (80.0%) and subtotal resection in 5 cases (20.0%). Median hospital stay was 2 d (1-12 d). All patients underwent postoperative radiation therapy. Perioperative complications developed in 1 patient (4.0%; hemiparesis and subsequent deep vein thrombosis). At 3-mo follow-up, no mortalities were observed, 19 patients (76.0%) demonstrated neurological improvements, 5 patients (20.0%) had a stable neurological exam, and 1 patient (4.0%) had a neurological decline. CONCLUSION: Utilization of a channel-based, navigable retractor and exoscope is a feasible option for surgical resection of metastatic brain lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakhsheshian et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: