Why the study?
The interaction between body mass index and NT-proBNP with respect to heart failure risk remains incompletely defined in patients with established cardiometabolic disease.
Does dapagliflozin reduce hospitalization for heart failure across BMI categories in patients with cardiometabolic disease and elevated NT-proBNP?
Meta-Analysis (n=24,455)
Yes
Does dapagliflozin reduce hospitalization for heart failure across BMI categories in patients with cardiometabolic disease and elevated NT-proBNP?
The risk of heart failure hospitalization varies across BMI categories for any given NT-proBNP level, highlighting the need to consider BMI when using NT-proBNP for risk stratification.
Aim N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations are lower in patients with obesity. The interaction between body mass index (BMI) and NT-proBNP with respect to heart failure risk remains incompletely defined. Methods and results Data were pooled across three randomized clinical trials enrolling predominantly patients who were overweight or obese with established cardiometabolic disease: SAVOR-TIMI 53, DECLARE-TIMI 58 and CAMELLIA-TIMI 61. Hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) was examined across strata of baseline BMI and NT-proBNP. The effect of dapagliflozin versus placebo was assessed for a treatment interaction across BMI categories in patients with or without an elevated baseline NT-proBNP (≥125 pg/ml). Among 24 455 patients, the median NT-proBNP was 96 (interquartile range [IQR]: 43–225) pg/ml and the median BMI was 33 (IQR 29–37) kg/m2, with 68% of patients having a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. There was a significant inverse association between NT-proBNP and BMI which persisted after adjustment for all clinical variables (p < 0.001). Within any range of NT-proBNP, those at higher BMI had higher risk of HHF at 2 years (comparing BMI <30 vs. ≥40 kg/m2 for NT-proBNP ranges of <125, 125–<450 and ≥450 pg/ml: 0.0% vs. 0.6%, 1.3% vs. 4.0%, and 8.1% vs. 13.8%, respectively), which persisted after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj] 7.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.16–17.66, HRadj 3.22 [95% CI 2.13–4.86], and HRadj 1.87 [95% CI 1.35–2.60], respectively). In DECLARE-TIMI 58, dapagliflozin versus placebo consistently reduced HHF across BMI categories in those with an elevated NT-proBNP (p-trend for HR across BMI = 0.60), with a pattern of greater absolute risk reduction (ARR) at higher BMI (ARR for BMI <30 to ≥40 kg/m2: 2.2% to 4.7%; p-trend = 0.059). Conclusions The risk of HHF varies across BMI categories for any given range of circulating NT-proBNP. These findings showcase the importance of considering BMI when applying NT-proBNP for heart failure risk stratification, particularly for patients with low-level elevations in NT-proBNP (125–<450 pg/ml) where there appears to be a clinically meaningful absolute and relative risk gradient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Overweight or obese with established cardiometabolic disease (n=24,455). Higher BMI (≥40 kg/m2) vs. Lower BMI (<30 kg/m2) was evaluated on Hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) at 2 years in patients with NT-proBNP 125-<450 pg/ml (HRadj 3.22, 95% CI 2.13-4.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: