Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To demonstrate the visual and refractive outcomes of wavefront -guided laser in situkeratomileusis 6 m postoperatively for low to moderate myopia in Assiut, Egypt. Methods: Thisprospective study took into account 39 eyes of 23 subjects treated with wavefront-guided LASIKwho were available for evaluation at 6 months. All participants were subject to preoperativewavefront analysis, which was performed with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer, VISX WaveScansystem. The clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided LASIK were evaluated in terms of in terms ofsafety, efficacy, predictability, stability, complications, and preoperative and postoperative aberrations. Results: Following the 6 month benchmark 13 eyes had no change in best spectaclecorrected visual acuity and 25 gained 1 or more lines. Only one eye lost one line. The safetyindex was 1.15 and the efficacy index, 1.06. 94.9 % of the eyes were within ± 0.50 diopter ofemmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 28 of the eyes. Supernormal vision(Best corrected visual acuity of 20/10 or better) was achieved in 32 of the eyes. There was asignificant increase in Root mean Square, coma and spherical aberrations 6m. postoperatively.Trefoil aberration was significantly decreased. No complications have been observed, such asepithelial ingrowth, diffuse lamellar keratitis, or infection was observed and Trefoil was decreased.Conclusion: Wavefront-guided LASIK provides significant improvement of Best corrected visualacuity, and significant increase in Root mean Square and coma while trefoil was significantlydecreased.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anwar et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: