OBJECTIVE: Single-cell foundation models such as scGPT learn rich representations of cellular identity, yet the biological programs encoded in their internal activations remain opaque. We investigate whether sparse autoencoders (SAEs), a mechanistic interpretability technique from AI safety research, can decompose these representations into sparse, biologically interpretable features. METHODS: We extract residual-stream activations from all 12 transformer layers of a pre-trained scGPT model processing 1000 human immune cells from the Tabula Sapiens atlas. We train SAEs with dictionary size M=2,048 at multiple sparsity levels (λ∈{1,3,10}) and evaluate recovered features using cell-type classification (AUROC), gene set enrichment (Fisher's exact test, FDR <0.05), and comparison with PCA baselines. Later-layer SAE features recover biologically coherent programs aligned with annotated cell types, with 64% of alive features receiving significant gene set annotations at layer 11 (λ=3). We observe a sparsity-dead-feature trade-off: at λ=10, up to 66% of dictionary elements become inactive. CONCLUSION: Mechanistic interpretability methods developed for large language models transfer productively to biological foundation models, but require domain-specific calibration. SAEs provide a principled approach to understanding what single-cell foundation models learn about cellular identity, with potential applications in model auditing and biological discovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ihor Kendiukhov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: