Key result
A high-wearable EEG-based transducer using Artificial Neural Network models and KMeansSMOTE achieved balanced accuracies of 71.2% and 74.5% for emotional and cognitive engagement, respectively.
Observational (n=4)
An EEG-based transducer combined with ANN and KMeansSMOTE oversampling achieved >70% balanced accuracy for detecting emotional and cognitive engagement in pediatric rehabilitation.
May support wearable EEG for engagement monitoring in pediatric rehab; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
A method for high-wearable EEG-based assessment of pediatric emotional and cognitive engagement in neuro-motor rehabilitation is proposed. A specific easy calibration is provided in the perspective of a personalized medicine. Due to the lack of studies evaluating pediatric multidimensional engagement, an observational non-interventional protocol was adopted for collecting the EEG data related to the high/low levels of engagement. The experimental validation of the proposed method involved four children performing a rehabilitation exercise in five 8-min sessions. Due to the age and frailty of the subjects, no negative emotions were expressly induced and an unbalanced dataset was obtained. Different Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE)-based strategies for unbalanced dataset management and classification methods were compared. The highest performances were achieved by combining Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models with the KMeansSMOTE oversampling method. Balanced accuracies of 71.2 % and 74.5 % for the emotional engagement and the cognitive engagement are obtained, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apicella et al. (2021) conducted an observational in pediatric neuro-motor rehabilitation (n=4). High-wearable EEG-based transducer was evaluated on balanced accuracy for emotional and cognitive engagement. A high-wearable EEG-based transducer using Artificial Neural Network models and KMeansSMOTE achieved balanced accuracies of 71.2% and 74.5% for emotional and cognitive engagement, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: