This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The AAP's Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for febrile infants provides recommendations in evaluating well-appearing febrile infants aged 8-60 days at risk for invasive bacterial infections (IBIs; ie, bacteremia and bacterial meningitis). However, guidance remains limited for the infants excluded from (ie, ineligible for) the CPG. The objectives are to estimate the proportion of well-appearing CPG-ineligible febrile infants and to examine CPG performance in detecting IBIs for CPG-ineligible febrile infants. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of single-site data collected for a prior study from 2011 to 2018. Infants were included if they were 8-60 days and well-appearing. We stratified IBI risk using age and CPG inflammatory marker thresholds for temperature, absolute neutrophil count, and C-reactive protein. We conducted analyses on CPG-ineligible infants and CPG-eligible infants. We estimated the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve, sensitivity, and specificity of both approaches in detecting IBIs. RESULTS: Of 648 infants, 22% did not meet CPG eligibility. Sensitivities for both analyses were 100% with specificities for CPG-ineligible and eligible of 38.1% (95% CI, 30-47) and 38.2% (95% CI, 33.9-42.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Strict adherence to the CPG may result in a substantial proportion of ineligible infants. Findings suggest that CPG-based approaches can maintain high sensitivities for all febrile infants, including CPG-ineligible infants. Future studies should examine the contribution of specific conditions (eg, preterm birth) to IBI risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knudson et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: