Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Results from observational studies on dietary fiber intake on total mortality and cause-specific mortality are inconsistent. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to investigate dietary fiber intake and mortality, and cause-specific mortality. Medline, EMBASE and web of science database was searched for cohort studies published from inception to February 2013. Studies were included if they provided a hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% CI for mortality in relation to fiber consumption. A database was developed on the basis of 25 eligible studies and 42 cohorts, including 1,752,848 individuals with an average 12.4 years of follow-up. Compared with those who consumed lowest fiber, for individuals who ate highest fiber, mortality rate was lower by 23% (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81) for cardiovascular diseases (CVD), by 23% (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81 ) for all-cause mortality, by 17% (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74- 0.91 ) for cancer, by 68% for digestive diseases, by 58 % for infectious diseases, 43 % for inflammatory diseases. For each 10 g/d increase in fiber intake, the pooled HR was estimated to be 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93 ) for all-cause mortality, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94 ) for cancer, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88 ) for coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality , and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.40-0.92 ) for ischemic heart disease (IHD) mortality . Dietary fiber and CVD mortality showed a strong dose-response relation. For each 10 g/d increase in fiber intake, the pooled HR of CVD mortality was estimated to be 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87 ; P for trend=0.0 0 1). In conclusion, our meta-analysis results clearly show that h igh dietary fiber intake is associated with low all-cause mortality and mortality due to CVD, CHD, cancer, digestive disease, infectious diseases, and other inflammatory diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: