Key result
Catheter ablation eliminates swallowing-induced supraventricular tachyarrhythmia with sustained remission at 2 years.
Why the study?
Swallowing-induced supraventricular tachyarrhythmia is an extremely rare condition with unclear pathophysiology and limited treatment data.
Does radiofrequency ablation resolve symptoms in patients with swallowing-induced supraventricular tachyarrhythmia?
Case Report (n=44)
Does radiofrequency ablation resolve symptoms in patients with swallowing-induced supraventricular tachyarrhythmia?
Radiofrequency ablation appears to be an effective and definitive treatment for the rare condition of swallowing-induced supraventricular tachyarrhythmia.
Supports ablation as option for rare swallowing-induced SVT; leaves open generalizability from single Level 5 case.
Swallowing-induced supraventricular tachyarrhythmia is an extremely rare entity with unclear pathophysiology. A 55-year-old man presented with a 2-year history of worsening presyncopal symptoms triggered only by drinking liquids of any temperature. Results of a physical examination were unremarkable except for reproducible atrial tachycardias to 180 to 210 beats/minute documented on rhythm strips when the patient was given water to drink. He underwent radiofrequency ablation with complete resolution of symptoms. We reviewed all 43 published cases of swallowing-induced supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in the English-language medical literature. We found only one other reported case induced only by drinking liquids. Radiofrequency ablation appears to be the treatment of choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalid et al. (2017) conducted a case report in Swallowing-induced supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (n=44). Radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Resolution of symptoms and tachycardia inducibility. Radiofrequency ablation successfully eliminated swallowing-induced supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in a 55-year-old man, with no recurrence of symptoms over 2 years of follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: