Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The stability of hydrate-in-oil dispersions is a critical parameter in assessing the risk of flowline blockage due to particle aggregation or wall deposition. Many studies of hydrate particle transportability have used deionized water to form the dispersion; however, the resulting lack of ions means that the crude oil’s natural surfactants will be less active, which does not represent production conditions. This study presents a new investigation of both hydrate-in-oil dispersion stability and water-in-oil emulsion stability, measured with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) apparatus, respectively. The results show that hydrate-in-oil dispersion stability increases directly with sodium chloride (NaCl) mass fraction in the aqueous phase; above 5 wt % NaCl, the dispersion was observed to be stable over ten hydrate formation–dissociation trials. This was comparable with the dispersion stability observed previously when an ionic surfactant was dosed at 2 wt % into the same crude oil. In contrast, only 0.1 wt % NaCl was required to stabilize water-in-oil emulsions over a four day observation period. This comparison suggests that, for crude oils containing natural surfactants, the risk of hydrate blockage may decrease as brine salinity increases from 1 to 10 wt %, without affecting the stability of the water-in-oil emulsion. The results demonstrate that experimental studies on hydrate- or water-in-crude oil systems should be performed with realistic values of brine salinity, to accurately capture dispersion stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aman et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: