Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Recently, the UK CCLG and COG reported that an intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) loses its adverse prognostic impact with intensified therapy. PATIENT AND METHODS: We evaluated the prognosis of iAMP21 among patients from the ALL-BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster) 2000 trial with 46 of 2 637 (2%) patients iAMP21+. RESULTS: 8-year event-free-survival (EFS, 64 ± 8% vs. 81 ± 1%, p=0.0026) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, 29 ± 8% vs. 14 ± 1%, p=0.008) of the iAMP21 cases were significantly worse compared with non-iAMP21 patients. Within the MRD low-risk group, iAMP21 cases (n=14) had an inferior 8-year EFS (76 ± 12% vs. 92 ± 1%, p=0.0081), but no increased CIR (10 ± 10% vs. 6 ± 1%, p=0.624). Within the MRD intermediate-risk group, iAMP21 cases (n=27) had a worse 8-year EFS (56 ± 11% vs. 78 ± 2%, p=0.0077) and CIR (44 ± 11% vs. 20 ± 2%, p=0.003) with 6/10 relapses occurring after 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusively, we believe that there is no necessity for enrolling all iAMP21 patients into the high-risk arm of ongoing ALL-BFM trials because MRD low-risk patients have a moderate relapse risk under current therapy. Whether the increased relapse risk in MRD intermediate-risk patients can be avoided by late treatment intensification remains to be answered by the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 trial randomly using protracted pegylated L-asparaginase during delayed intensification and early maintenance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attarbaschi et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: