Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To compare effectiveness of 5% acetic acid, 10% formic acid, and chloroform used adjunctively with a rotary retreatment system in removing a premixed calcium-silicate sealer (Ceraseal) and gutta-percha from root canals, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to quantify residuals across canal thirds. Materials and methods: Thirty-six extracted single-rooted anterior teeth were instrumented, obturated (single-cone GP + Ceraseal), and stored for two weeks. Specimens were retreated with HyFlex Remover files and randomly assigned (n = 9/group) to: G1-5% acetic acid; G2- 10% formic acid; G3-chloroform; G4-distilled water (negative control). Two milliliters of test solution were used with repeated instrumentation until patency; canals were then irrigated with saline and dried. Roots were split; standardized SEM images (×1000) of coronal, middle, and apical thirds were scored. Results: Intragroup, residuals increased apically in all solvent groups: in G1, apical > middle > coronal (all p = 0.021); in G2, apical > coronal/middle (p = 0.021); in G3, apical > coronal (p = 0.021); G4 showed no significant intragroup differences. Intergroup, coronal third: G1 had significantly lower residuals than G3 and G4; G1 ≈ G2; G2 ≈ G3 ≈ G4. Middle third: G1 and G2 < G4 (p = 0.021); no other pairwise differences. Apical third: no significant between-group differences. Conclusions: When combined with HyFlex Remover files, 5% acetic and 10% formic acids enhanced removal of Ceraseal/gutta-percha, particularly in coronal third; 5% acetic outperformed chloroform coronally. In middle and apical thirds, acidic solvents, chloroform, and water yielded broadly comparable outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sindhuja et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: