Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary Neuromuscular blocking agents (muscle relaxants) are useful and common adjuncts to general anesthesia for human beings, but have not been used extensively during anesthesia of large animal species. Over a 3-year period, atracurium or pancuronium were used as adjuncts to general anesthesia for 89 anesthetic procedures in 88 equids (of 18 breeds and age ranging in age from 5 weeks to 25 years) at the teaching hospital. Forty-one of the anesthetic procedures were for abdominal surgery, and orthopedic (n = 19), ophthalmologic (n = 17), thoracotomy (n = 1), and soft tissue (n = 14) procedures composed the rest. Most equids were given atracurium because it was less expensive than pancuronium. Initial dosage of either relaxant ranged from 0.12 to 0.2 mg/kg of body weight iv, and repeat doses ranged from 10 to 30 mg. Relaxants were used for as long as 205 minutes. Muscles of the face or hind limb digital extensor muscles were used to monitor relaxation. Muscles of the hind limb were more sensitive to the effects of relaxants than were muscles of the face. At the end of a surgical procedure, just prior to being taken to the recovery stall, a relaxant antagonist, edrophonium (0.5 to 1 mg/kg), was administered iv to each equid. Edrophonium caused blood pressure to increase in most of the equids. Heart rate change was variable, with approximately half the equids having no change or increased heart rate and the remainder having decreased heart rate. Recovery to standing after anesthesia was rated excellent or good for 72 equids, fair for 11, and poor for 2. In one equid, difficult recovery was attributed to inadequate reversal of relaxant. Relaxants were considered particularly useful for ensuring a motionless eye during ophthalmologic surgery, improving surgical exposure for abdominal surgery such as ovariectomy, facilitating fracture reduction, and solving problems of persistent intraoperative movement coincident with hypotension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hildebrand et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: