This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Late-life depression often co-occurs with cognitive difficulty, but whether amyloid burden is associated with mood and cognitive change during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in older adults is unknown. Methods: In this single-arm pre-post study, 41 older adults were enrolled; 3 withdrew before receiving the device, and 38 received home-based tDCS and completed baseline (V1), post-stimulation (V2), and follow-up (V3) assessments. Depression, insomnia, subjective cognition, MoCA, and a detailed cognitive battery were examined, and 31 change outcomes were regressed on Centiloid and 21 regional amyloid indicators with covariate adjustment. Results: No participant met the ≥50% GDS response criterion, whereas 60.5% showed a ≥2-point MoCA gain; the absent depression response reflects a floor effect expected from the low baseline severity rather than inefficacy. No association survived Benjamini-Hochberg correction across the complete exploratory family. In a biologically motivated Centiloid-only analysis, however, greater Centiloid burden was associated with smaller MoCA gain, and this association survived correction in both the full-analysis and per-protocol sets. Phonemic-fluency findings were less stable, and no comparable FDR-supported association was detected for depression, insomnia, or subjective cognition. Conclusions: The findings do not support a broad amyloid-related cognitive pattern, but they identify a focused, hypothesis-generating Centiloid-MoCA association during the protocol. Because the study was single-arm, neither the observed changes nor the amyloid association can be attributed to stimulation itself. Controlled studies with prespecified outcomes are required.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: