Key result
Tepid hypothermic circulatory arrest at 32 °C linked to fewer neurological complications versus deep hypothermia.
Why the study?
Postoperative cerebral complications and lack of guidelines for optimal perfusion temperature and flow in TARCH with hypothermic circulatory arrest motivated evaluation of tepid hypothermia at 32 °C.
Does tepid hypothermic circulatory arrest at 32 °C improve operative parameters and reduce neurological complications compared to deep hypothermia in patients undergoing total aortic arch replacement?
Cohort (n=50)
Does tepid hypothermic circulatory arrest at 32 °C improve operative parameters and reduce neurological complications compared to deep hypothermia in patients undergoing total aortic arch replacement?
Tepid hypothermic circulatory arrest at 32 °C during total aortic arch replacement appears safe and significantly reduces extracorporeal circulation times and neurological complications compared to deep hypothermia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tepid 32°C HCA may reduce complications in TARCH; leaves open optimal temperature pending prospective trials.
In total aortic arch replacement (TARCH) using hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) and selective cerebral perfusion (SCP), postoperative cerebral complications, including metabolic abnormalities, are by no means rare. Furthermore, there is a lack of international guidelines for the optimal perfusion temperature and flow for SCP. Starting in 2008, TARCH was performed using tepid HCA at 32 °C. In the present study, 27 patients (group C) who underwent TARCH with deep hypothermia at the lowest rectal temperatures of 20-25 °C were retrospectively reviewed and compared with 23 patients (group W) who underwent TARCH with 32 °C tepid hypothermia. Preoperative patient characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative parameters were compared. Preoperative patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Circulatory arrest time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, operating time, amount of blood transfused and postoperative neurological complications were significantly reduced in group W compared with group C. Our procedure of TARCH using tepid hypothermia at 32 °C was safe, and it significantly reduced all parameters of extracorporeal circulation time. However, this study has several limitations. To indicate the safety and usefulness of tepid HCA for TARCH, a further multifaceted study should be performed with a greater number of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Total aortic arch replacement (n=50). Tepid hypothermic circulatory arrest (32 °C) vs. Deep hypothermia (20-25 °C) was evaluated on Intraoperative and postoperative parameters including extracorporeal circulation times, blood transfusion, and neurological complications. Tepid hypothermic circulatory arrest at 32 °C significantly reduced circulatory arrest time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, operating time, blood transfusion, and neurological complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: