Key result
PiCCO™-guided hemodynamic management was associated with significantly higher 30-day mortality compared to standard monitoring in comatose patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Why the study?
Proper hemodynamic management is necessary among post-cardiac arrest patients to improve survival, but the effects of PiCCO-guided hemodynamic management on mortality are unclear.
Does PiCCO-guided hemodynamic management reduce mortality in comatose patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation?
Cohort (n=63)
No
Does PiCCO-guided hemodynamic management reduce mortality in comatose patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation?
In comatose patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation, PiCCO-guided hemodynamic management was associated with higher 30-day mortality, particularly in those with better baseline health conditions.
Proper hemodynamic management is necessary among post-cardiac arrest patients to improve survival. We aimed to investigate the effects of PiCCO™-guided (pulse index contour cardiac output) hemodynamic management on mortality in post-resuscitation therapy. In this longitudinal analysis of 63 comatose patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation cooled to 32-34 °C, 33 patients received PiCCO™, and 30 were not monitored with PiCCO™. Primary and secondary outcomes were 30 day and 1 year mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to assess differences in mortality among the groups. Interaction effects to disentangle the relationship between patient's condition, PiCCO™ application, and mortality were assessed by means of Chi-square tests and logistic regression models. A 30 day mortality was significantly higher among PiCCO™ patients, while 1 year mortality was marginally higher. More severe patient condition per se was not the cause of higher mortality rate in the PiCCO™ group. Patients in better health conditions (without ST-elevation myocardial infarction, without cardiogenic shock, without intra-aortic balloon pump device, or without stroke in prior history) had worse outcomes with PiCCO™-guided therapy. Catecholamine administration worsened both 30 day and 1 year mortality among all patients. Our analysis showed that there was a complex interaction relationship between PiCCO™-guided therapy, patients' condition, and 30 day mortality for most conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovács et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Comatose patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n=63). PiCCO™-guided hemodynamic management vs. Standard hemodynamic monitoring without PiCCO™ was evaluated on 30-day mortality (p=<0.05). PiCCO™-guided hemodynamic management was associated with significantly higher 30-day mortality compared to standard monitoring in comatose patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: