Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has expanded the cyberattack surface, exposing resource-constrained endpoints to Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks, Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs), and zero-day exploits that signature-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) cannot reliably counter. A critical gap separates detection from active attacker engagement: honeypots operate in static isolation with no feedback into detection pipelines, while IDS solutions cannot autonomously redirect adversaries or harvest intelligence. This paper proposes the Collaborative Cyber Deception (CCD) framework, a four-stage closed-loop architecture integrating real-time detection, Software-Defined Networking (SDN)-enforced redirection, multi-protocol honeypot engagement, and continuous retraining. The BXLL detection stage is empirically validated on benchmark data; the redirection, honeypot, and retraining stages are executed in a discrete-event simulation of the full pipeline under Poisson load, though not on hardware. At the core of CCD is the BXLL stacking ensemble, in which Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) binary predictions are concatenated with standardised flow features as temporal meta-features before training LightGBM and XGBoost base learners, whose outputs are unified by a Logistic Regression meta-learner. Class imbalance is addressed through inverse-frequency weighting. On full hold-out test sets, BXLL achieves accuracy of 99.23%, 99.83%, and 99.34% with F1-Scores of 97.01%, 99.83%, and 99.41% on UNSW-NB15, X-IIoTID, and CIC-ToN-IoT. P95 per-sample inference latency is ≤ 266 μ s. The estimated component-level detection-to-redirection budget is 1.6 ms, but the simulation shows that batch-formation delay of 5.3–14.4 ms dominates it at the gateway, and that the SDN controller must be provisioned against the redirect rate implied by a deployment’s attack rate. McNemar’s test confirms significant superiority over the Decision Tree baseline ( p < 0.001) on all three datasets. XGBoost alone is nonetheless competitive with the full ensemble on every metric reported here, so the contribution is claimed for the closed-loop architecture rather than for the stacking design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iqbal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: