Key result
Reduced HRV and RRV track worsening organ dysfunction, with falling HRV preceding shock onset.
Why the study?
The utility of continuous heart rate variability and respiratory rate variability monitoring to track daily organ dysfunction and identify variability patterns during shock onset and respiratory failure resolution in critically ill patients was evaluated.
Does continuous HRV and RRV monitoring track daily organ dysfunction in critically ill patients?
Observational (n=33)
Does continuous HRV and RRV monitoring track daily organ dysfunction in critically ill patients?
Continuous monitoring of heart rate and respiratory rate variability may help track organ dysfunction severity and predict clinical events like shock onset or extubation success in critically ill patients.
Continuous HRV/RRV monitoring may track organ dysfunction in critical illness; leaves open whether it guides therapy or improves outcomes.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of using continuous heart rate variability (HRV) and respiratory rate variability (RRV) monitoring for (a) tracking daily organ dysfunction in critically ill patients and (b) identifying patterns of variability changes during onset of shock and resolution of respiratory failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three critically ill patients experiencing respiratory and/or cardiac failure underwent continuous recording of their electrocardiogram and capnogram (CO2) waveforms from admission or intubation until discharge (maximum 14 days). HRV and RRV were computed in 5-minute overlapping windows, using Continuous Individualized Multi-organ Variability Analysis software. Multiple organ dysfunction scores were recorded daily. HRV and RRV trajectories were characterized during onset of shock and resolution of respiratory failure. RESULTS: Both HRV and RRV decreased with increasing severity of multiple organ dysfunction scores for a variety of variability metrics. A decline in several measures of HRV and no decline in RRV were observed before onset of shock (n=6). In contrast, during resolution of respiratory failure, an increase in RRV was observed in patients who successfully passed extubation (n=12), with no change in RRV in those who subsequently failed extubation (n=2). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between reduced HRV and RRV and increasing organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. The significance of observing trends of decreasing HRV (with onset of shock) and increasing RRV (with resolution of respiratory failure) merits further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Green et al. (2013) conducted an observational in critically ill patients experiencing respiratory and/or cardiac failure (n=33). Continuous heart rate variability (HRV) and respiratory rate variability (RRV) monitoring was evaluated on Daily organ dysfunction, onset of shock, and resolution of respiratory failure. Reduced heart rate and respiratory rate variability were associated with increasing organ dysfunction, with declining HRV preceding shock onset (n=6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: