⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

April 3, 2026Psychological Inquiry

Advancing Research on the Origins of Judgment and Decision-Making

Radhika Santhanagopalan Margaret Echelbarger Jane L. Risen Katherine D. Kinzler

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Address peer commentaries and extend the foundational framework concerning the origins of judgment and decision-making.
Synthesized critical peer commentary responding to the original target article on the origins of judgment and decision-making (OJDM).
Evaluated proposed extensions of the core logic across developmental and cognitive contexts.
Confirms that core principles of the OJDM model operate across early developmental settings and broader behavioral contexts.
Identifies key conceptual boundaries and outlines prospective avenues for empirical research in decision science.

Implication

Theoretical review uncovers foundational origins of judgment and decision-making across domains, suggesting developmental roots shape human choices.

Abstract

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Santhanagopalan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6ab22e7fe0582274b105ced6 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2026.2724090

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1An Evolving Landscape of the Psychology of Judgment and Decision-Making: A Bibliometric Analysis2024
2Social and Moral Decision Making: An Informative Domain for Developmental Judgment and Decision MakingOriginal Research · 2026
3Justice Decision Observability™: Decision Pathway Reconstruction Methodology (Version 1.2)Original Research · 2026
4Justice Decision Observability™: A Category Primer for Documenting Human Decision Pathways in Algorithmically Influenced Justice Systems (Version 1.2)Review · 2026
5From Orchestration to Integrated Judgment OptimizationOriginal Research · 2026

More related papers

Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™): Category Ownership Manifesto (Version 1.2) JDO-2026-0012026
Justice Decision Observability™: Reference Architecture for Observing Human Decision Pathways in AI-Supported Justice Systems (Version 1.2)2026
From Decision Experience to Decision Patrimony (Patrimônio Decisório): An Intertemporal Conceptual Architecture for Structuring, Preserving, and Mobilizing Knowledge in Human Decision-Making2026

More from Psychological Inquiry

Using Developmental Science to Understand Cultural Input and Isolate Core Cognitive Competencies Involved in Judgment and Decision MakingFri,
The Origins of Moral Judgment and Decision-MakingFri,