Key result
German iPBI demonstrates validity and links irrational beliefs to mild psychological distress in athletes.
Why the study?
Irrational beliefs and their associations with general and sport-specific mental health markers in German athletes had not been meaningfully studied.
Cross-Sectional (n=234)
The German version of the Irrational Performance Beliefs Inventory (iPBI) is a valid and reliable tool for assessing irrational beliefs in athletes, which correlate with markers of mental health.
German iPBI supports athlete mental health assessment; leaves open causal links to distress or wellbeing and requires longitudinal validation.
In this article, we conducted the first meaningful study of irrational beliefs (IBs) in a German sample of athletes. Moreover, we investigated associations between IBs and potential general as well as sport-specific markers of mental health in German athletes. As general markers, we considered psychological distress and wellbeing in addition to IBs, and as sport-specific markers, we considered anxiety, perfectionism, and athletic identity. To achieve this, our first step was to translate and validate a specific measure of irrational beliefs, namely the Irrational Performance Beliefs Inventory (iPBI). The iPBI is a performance-relevant measure that captures specific IB, taking into account the situational circumstances of the target population, namely operators in different performance context (academia, sports, business, medicine, etc.). Its theoretical basis is largely Ellis' work on rational and irrational beliefs. We developed a short and a long version of the iPBI, which both capture four core IBs (i.e., demandingness, awfulization, low frustration tolerance, and depreciation). Factorial validity was confirmed by a confirmatory factor analysis (comparative fit index = 0.92) with data from 234 athletes. Both versions of the newly developed iPBI showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.77) and retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients >0.71). Results of the correlational analyses indicated low positive relationships between IBs and athletes' psychological distress, and low negative relations between IBs and wellbeing. In terms of sport-specific markers, there were low to moderate correlations with IBs. This study also examined the differences in IBs between females and males, individual and team sport athletes, and across three different performance levels. Implications of these findings are discussed along with approaches for future research and applied work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michel‐Kröhler et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Mental health in athletes (n=234). Irrational beliefs vs. Lower levels of irrational beliefs was evaluated on Correlation between irrational beliefs and psychological distress/wellbeing. The German version of the Irrational Performance Beliefs Inventory demonstrated good factorial validity and revealed that irrational beliefs had low positive correlations with psychological distress and low negative correlations with wellbeing in athletes.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: