Key result
CRT increases stroke volume and work metabolic index versus AAI pacing, without added sequential benefit.
Why the study?
The effects of sequential cardiac resynchronization therapy on myocardial oxidative metabolism and efficiency had not been previously assessed.
Does sequential CRT improve myocardial oxidative metabolism and efficiency compared to simultaneous CRT or AAI pacing in patients with NYHA class III heart failure?
Comparison
AAI pacing vs simultaneous CRT vs sequential CRT
Design
Cross-sectional study with repeated measures
Follow-up
1 hour per pacing mode
Authors
Loading...
Preliminary CRT efficiency data should not alter practice; leaves open larger randomized confirmation in heart failure.
Does sequential CRT improve myocardial oxidative metabolism and efficiency compared to simultaneous CRT or AAI pacing in patients with NYHA class III heart failure?
In a small cohort of heart failure patients, CRT improved myocardial efficiency and stroke volume without increasing oxidative metabolism, though sequential CRT offered no significant advantage over simultaneous CRT.
Christenson et al. (2007) studied NYHA class III heart failure (n=8). Simultaneous and sequential cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs. AAI pacing was evaluated on Myocardial oxidative metabolism (MVO2), stroke volume index (SVI), and work metabolic index (WMI). CRT significantly increased stroke volume index (P<0.001) and work metabolic index (P=0.002) compared to AAI pacing, with no significant additional benefit from sequential over simultaneous CRT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: