Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 25, 2019BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care

Management of venous thromboembolism in far-advanced cancer: current practice

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Continuing LMWH near death in advanced cancer yields a 7% bleeding rate without symptom benefit.

  • n=214

Why the study?

There are no data on the management of cancer-associated thrombosis at the end of life or when to stop anticoagulation as death approaches in patients with advanced cancer.

Does continuing anticoagulation for VTE until near death in advanced cancer patients confer bleeding risk without preventing VTE symptoms?

Population

214 patients with advanced cancer anticoagulated for VTE who died over a 2-year period

Comparison

Continuation of LMWH until death or within days vs discontinuation earlier prior to death

Design

Retrospective cohort study reviewing hospital, hospice, and community notes

Follow-up

Until death over a 2-year period

Authors

SNSimon NobleSBSophie BanerjeeNPNikki Pease

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May support deprescribing LMWH near death in advanced cancer VTE; leaves open optimal duration pending RCTs.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=214)

Structured PICO

Does continuing anticoagulation for VTE until near death in advanced cancer patients confer bleeding risk without preventing VTE symptoms?

P
Population
214 patients with advanced cancer and cancer-associated thrombosis who died over a 2-year period, evaluated retrospectively for end-of-life anticoagulation management.
E
Exposure
Continuation of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) up to or within days of death
C
Comparator
Discontinuation of LMWH earlier (1 week to over 1 month prior to death)
O
Outcome
Timing of discontinuation of anticoagulation, complications of anticoagulation (bleeding), and symptoms associated with VTE at the end of lifesafety

Continuing anticoagulation for VTE near the end of life in advanced cancer patients appears to increase bleeding risk without providing additional symptomatic benefit.

Limitations

  • Retrospective data across healthcare settings

Cite This Study

Noble et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Cancer-associated thrombosis in advanced cancer (n=214). Continuation of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) until death or up to 7 days prior was evaluated on Clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Continuing low-molecular-weight heparin until near death in patients with advanced cancer and VTE resulted in a 7% rate of clinically relevant non-major bleeding without preventing VTE symptoms.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6ab23a67b3425f107fd63662https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001804
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients2007 · 796 citations
  2. 2The prevention of hospital‐acquired venous thromboembolism in the United Kingdom2008 · 38 citations
  3. 3The prognostic utility of tests of platelet function for the detection of ‘aspirin resistance’ in patients with established cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease: a systematic review and economic evaluation2015 · 27 citations
  4. 4Impact of a dedicated cancer-associated thrombosis service on clinical outcomes: a mixed-methods evaluation of a clinical improvement exercise2016 · 17 citations
  5. 5Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients2008 · 552 citations