Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the muscular activity and metabolic response between a novel handle-based wheelchair drive (KURT) and conventional push rim propulsion in a simulated daily mobility circuit. DESIGN: Single-group comparative study between 3 wheelchair configurations. PARTICIPANTS: 22 healthy individuals without prior wheelchair experience. METHODS: Participants completed a multi--movement circuit including ramps, obstacle avoidance, and directional changes using KURT and 2 push-rim wheelchairs with different wheel sizes (small wheels, SW; large wheels, LW). Electromyographic data were collected bilaterally from 7 upper body muscles, and cardiopulmonary variables were -continuously monitored. RESULTS: Biceps brachii activity was significantly higher with KURT than with SW and LW for both arms (all p < 0.001), while triceps brachii and pectoralis major activity were significantly lower (all p < 0.001). Other monitored muscles showed smaller relative differences between configurations, often resulting in limited or no statistically significant effects. Metabolic demand was lower with KURT: heart rate, oxygen consumption, and carbon dioxide production were reduced compared with LW (all p < 0.05), while respiratory exchange ratio was unchanged and respiratory frequency was higher than with SW (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: KURT appears to be a promising, more energy-efficient alternative to push-rim wheelchairs, reducing upper limb muscle demand and metabolic cost. These findings motivate studies in regular wheelchair users and longer-term use in daily living scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aronis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: