United Kingdom (UK) healthcare system is quite successful for achieving goals of good health outcomes, risk protection, and public satisfaction. on the Commonwealth Fund study in 2014, UK healthcare ranks first regarding quality, access, efficiency, equity, and lives among 11 developed nations with even a fair cost. However, it comes to cancer outcomes, UK lags behind many developed . Cancer survival is a good example of an area in which both outcomes and public satisfaction, key determinants of quality, strikingly lacking. Therefore, this paper, to analyze and formulate to address deficient quality in the English health system, will at the particular example of cancer survival rates. The key factors to deficient outcomes in cancer survival are delays in diagnosis access to appropriate care. Policy recommendations to improve survival rates are to timely screening and early diagnostic opportunities the primary care system, utilize available treatment and quick approval and workforce training for utilization of treatments and drugs, and continue prioritizing cancer care coordination integration through improved referral services, and increase decision support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KADİR GÜRSOY (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: