Key result
Basilar artery dolichosis linked to ~205% higher risk of recurrent brainstem infarction.
Why the study?
The association between basilar artery dolichosis and long-term stroke recurrence in patients with acute pontine infarction has received little attention.
Does basilar artery dolichosis increase the risk of long-term brainstem infarction recurrence in patients with acute pontine infarction?
Cohort (n=113)
No
Does basilar artery dolichosis increase the risk of long-term brainstem infarction recurrence in patients with acute pontine infarction?
Basilar artery dolichosis is an independent predictor of long-term brainstem infarction recurrence in patients with acute pontine infarction, particularly in those aged 65 years or older.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant closer monitoring for recurrence in API patients with BA dolichosis; leaves open whether it modifies secondary prevention.
Background and Purpose: Patients with basilar artery (BA) dolichosis are at high risk of acute pontine infarction (API), but the association between BA dolichosis and long–term stroke recurrence has received little attention. We aimed to identify the effect of BA dolichosis on the risk of long–term brainstem infarction recurrence in patients with API. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled 113 patients with API admitted to our department. BA dolichosis was diagnosed by a BA curve length >29.5 mm or bending length (BL) >10 mm on magnetic resonance angiography. The primary outcome was the occurrence of diffusion–weighted imaging (DWI)–confirmed brainstem infarction. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to detect possible predictors of brainstem infarction recurrence. Results: Among 113 patients with API, 39 (34.5%) patients had BA dolichosis, and DWI–confirmed brainstem infarction recurred in 15 (13.3%) patients with a mean follow–up time of 31.2 months; the estimated 5–year incidence of brainstem infarction recurrence was 23.1% in patients with BA dolichosis, which was significantly higher than the incidence of 8.1% in patients without BA dolichosis. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that age ≥65 years (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.341, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.079–10.348, P = 0.036) and BA dolichosis (HR = 3.048, 95% CI: 1.069–8.693, P = 0.037) were significantly associated with a higher risk of brainstem infarction recurrence. In a subgroup analysis stratified by age, the patients aged ≥65 years with BA dolichosis had a higher risk of brainstem infarction recurrence (HR = 7.319, 95% CI: 1.525–35.123, P = 0.013). Conclusions: This study indicates that BA dolichosis may increase the risk of long–term brainstem infarction recurrence in patients with API, especially in elderly patients, and therefore warrants more attention in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute pontine infarction (n=113). Basilar artery dolichosis vs. Without basilar artery dolichosis was evaluated on Occurrence of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-confirmed brainstem infarction (HR 3.048, 95% CI 1.069-8.693, p=0.037). Basilar artery dolichosis increased the risk of long-term brainstem infarction recurrence in patients with acute pontine infarction compared to those without.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: