Key result
RNA-Seq identifies ~160 novel hypertension-specific SNPs in hypertensive ISIAH rats.
Why the study?
Strain-specific SNPs in ISIAH rats, a model of stress-induced arterial hypertension, and their genetic differences from other rat strains were not fully characterized.
Identification of novel strain-specific SNPs in ISIAH rats provides potential molecular targets for studying stress-induced hypertension.
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the coding and regulatory regions of genes can affect transcription rate and translation efficiency, modify protein function, and, in some cases, cause the development of diseases. In the current study, the RNA-Seq approach has been used to discover strain-specific SNPs in ISIAH (inherited stress-induced arterial hypertension) rats, which are known as a model of stress-induced arterial hypertension. The comparison of the ISIAH SNPs with genome sequencing data available for another 42 rat strains and substrains, 11 of them known as hypertensive, showed a considerable genetic distance between the genotypes of ISIAH and all other rat strains and substrains. The study revealed 1849 novel SNPs specific for ISIAH rats and 158 SNPs present only in the genotypes of hypertensive rats. Amino acid substitutions with possible deleterious effect on protein function were detected. Several of them were found in the genes associated with hypertension. These SNPs may be considered as novel molecular targets for further studies aimed at assessing their potential in the therapy of stress-induced hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ershov et al. (2017) studied Stress-induced arterial hypertension. RNA-Seq for SNP discovery vs. 42 other rat strains and substrains was evaluated on Strain-specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). RNA-Seq analysis revealed 1849 novel SNPs specific for ISIAH rats and 158 SNPs present only in the genotypes of hypertensive rats, including substitutions in hypertension-associated genes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: