Key result
Genotype-guided acenocoumarol dosing increases 90-day steady-dose achievement by ~56% over standard care.
Why the study?
Few trials have evaluated the effectiveness of algorithms for calculating oral anticoagulant doses, with negative or contradictory results.
Does a genotype-guided dosing algorithm improve the achievement of a steady dose and therapeutic INR in patients with atrial fibrillation starting acenocoumarol?
RCT (n=179)
randomized
Does a genotype-guided dosing algorithm improve the achievement of a steady dose and therapeutic INR in patients with atrial fibrillation starting acenocoumarol?
Genotype-guided dosing of acenocoumarol significantly improves the proportion of patients achieving a steady dose and therapeutic INR compared to standard physician management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports genotype-guided acenocoumarol initiation in AF; confirms pharmacogenetic dosing benefit over standard care.
A few trials so far have evaluated the effectiveness of algorithms designed to calculate doses in oral anticoagulant therapy, with negative or contradictory results. We compared a genotype-guided algorithm vs physician management for the initiation of acenocoumarol. In a two-arm, prospective, randomised study with patients with atrial fibrillation who started therapy, the first dose was administered to all patients according to the physician's criteria. At 72 hours, the corresponding dose was calculated based on INR in the standard care group (SC, N=92), whereas genetic data (VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP4F2) were also considered for the genotype-guided dosing (pharmacogenetic) group (PGx, N=87) by using an algorithm previously validated in 2,683 patients. The primary outcomes were: patients with steady dose, the time needed to reach the same and the percentage of therapeutic INRs. After 90 days, 25% of the SC and 39% of the PGx patients reached the steady dose (p=0.038). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that PGx group needed fewer days to reach therapeutic INR (p=0.033). Additionally, PGx had a higher percentage of therapeutic INRs than SC patients (50% and 45%, respectively) (p=0.046). After six months the proportion of steadily anticoagulated patients remained significantly higher in PGx (p=0.010). In conclusion, genotype-guided dosing was associated with a higher percentage of patients with steady dose than routine practice when starting oral anticoagulation with acenocoumarol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cerezo-Manchado et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in atrial fibrillation (n=179). Genotype-guided dosing algorithm vs. Standard care (physician management based on INR) was evaluated on Patients reaching steady dose at 90 days (p=0.038). Genotype-guided dosing of acenocoumarol increased the percentage of patients reaching a steady dose at 90 days compared to standard care.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: