Key result
Cardiac myxomas show ~53% higher native T1 relaxation times compared to normal myocardium on CMR.
Why the study?
Identification and differentiation of cardiac tumors have wide clinical implications, and recent CMR parametric mapping techniques allow quantitative tissue characterization.
Does CMR parametric mapping differentiate cardiac myxomas from normal myocardium based on T1, T2, and ECV values?
Cross-Sectional (n=9)
No
Does CMR parametric mapping differentiate cardiac myxomas from normal myocardium based on T1, T2, and ECV values?
Parametric CMR mapping reveals elevated native T1, T2, and ECV values in cardiac myxomas compared to normal myocardium, which may aid in non-invasive tumor differentiation.
May aid non-invasive myxoma differentiation on CMR; leaves open prospective validation in larger cohorts.
Introduction: While cardiac tumors are rare, their identification and differentiation has wide clinical implications. Recent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parametric mapping techniques allow for quantitative tissue characterization. Our aim was to examine the range of values encountered in cardiac myxomas in correlation to histological measurements. Methods and Results: Nine patients with histologically proven cardiac myxomas were included. CMR (1.5 Tesla, Philips) including parametric mapping was performed in all patients pre-operatively. All data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Compared to myocardium, cardiac myxomas demonstrated higher native T1 relaxation times (1554 ± 192 ms vs 1017 ± 58 ms, p < .001), ECV (46.9 ± 13.0 % vs. 27.1 ± 2.6 %, p = .001) and T2 relaxation times (209 ± 120 ms vs. 52 ± 3 ms, p = .008). Areas with LGE showed higher ECV than areas without (54.3 ± 17.8 % vs. 32.7 ± 18.6 %, p = .042), with differences in native T1 relaxation times (1644 ± 217 ms vs. 1482 ± 351 ms, p = .291) and T2 relaxation times (356 ± 236 ms vs. 129 ± 68 ms, p = .155) not reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: Parametric CMR showed elevated native T1 and T2 relaxation times and ECV values in cardiac myxomas compared to normal myocardium, reflecting an increased interstitial space and fluid content. This might help in the differentiation of cardiac myxomas from other tumor entities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasser et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac myxoma (n=9). Cardiac myxoma tissue vs. Normal myocardium was evaluated on Native T1 relaxation time (p=<0.001). Cardiac myxomas demonstrated significantly higher native T1 relaxation times (1,554 vs. 1,017 ms), extracellular volume, and T2 relaxation times compared to normal myocardium on parametric CMR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: