Key result
Atrial pacing boosts myocardial pumping efficiency ~63% vs. ventricular pacing with lower oxygen consumption.
Why the study?
Uncertainty exists about the optimal pacing rate, range, and mode after cardiac surgery due to incomplete information on myocardial oxygen consumption and pumping efficiency during cardiac pacing.
Does atrial pacing compared to ventricular pacing improve myocardial pumping efficiency and oxygen consumption in normal and failing dog hearts?
Does atrial pacing compared to ventricular pacing improve myocardial pumping efficiency and oxygen consumption in normal and failing dog hearts?
Atrial pacing provides better hemodynamics with lower myocardial oxygen consumption compared to ventricular pacing, suggesting it is the optimal pacing technique for low output syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Atrial pacing may offer efficiency gains in select patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized trials before any practice change.
Temporary cardiac pacing (CP) is frequently applied postoperatively in the management of low cardiac output (CO) and rhythm instability. However, uncertainty exists about the "optimal" pacing rate, range and mode due to incomplete information on myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2), related to its hemodynamic determinants, and on myocardial pumping efficiency (eta) at CP. In 10 intact dogs atrial pacing (AP) (90 to 210 beats/min) and ventricular pacing (VP) (70 to 330 beats/min) were investigated in normal and failing hearts. AP and VP were compared at identical rates. MVO2 (4 to 20 ml/min . 100 gr) was measured directly according to the Fick principle. Cardiac efficiency was calculated as the ratio of oxygen equivalent of external cardiac work to MVO2. Rates with maximum CO and a maximal eta occurred only in heart failure. However, maximal CO and eta were obtained at different heart rates (HR). MVO2 was significantly higher (p less than 0.001) under VP as compared to AP at identical rates with a mean increase of 26.5% +/- 6% over AP, although hemodynamics were significantly lower under VP (p less than 0.001). Myocardial pumping efficiency was markedly better under AP with a mean increase of 63% +/- 4.5% over VP even in normal heart. Adjustment of HR at maximal response in CO may become dangerous, particularly under VP, in heart failure. AP, if applicable, may be regarded as the optimal pacing technique due to an optimal relation of improved hemodynamics to MVO2. It may be helpful in correcting an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand in cases of low output syndrome. The pathophysiologic mechanisms and further clinical implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baller et al. (1981) studied normal and failing hearts (n=10). Atrial pacing vs. Ventricular pacing was evaluated on Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) and myocardial pumping efficiency (mean increase of 63% ± 4.5% over VP (efficiency), p=<0.001). Atrial pacing improved myocardial pumping efficiency by a mean of 63% and resulted in lower myocardial oxygen consumption compared to ventricular pacing at identical rates.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: