Key result
AI-based CT FFR ≤ 0.80 was a better predictor for coronary revascularization and major cardiovascular events than stenosis ≥ 50% at triple-rule-out CT angiography.
Why the study?
The additional value of AI-based CT-derived fractional flow reserve from triple-rule-out coronary CT angiography in acute chest pain patients in the emergency department was unclear.
Does AI-based CT FFR derived from triple-rule-out CT angiography better predict coronary revascularization and MACE compared to standard CT angiography in patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain?
Cohort (n=159)
Does AI-based CT FFR derived from triple-rule-out CT angiography better predict coronary revascularization and MACE compared to standard CT angiography in patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain?
AI-based CT FFR derived from triple-rule-out CT angiography improves the prediction of coronary revascularization and MACE compared to standard stenosis assessment in ED patients with acute chest pain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CT FFR ≤0.80 may better predict revascularization and MACE than stenosis in ED chest pain; hypothesis-generating for prospective validation.
Purpose To evaluate the additional value of noninvasive artificial intelligence (AI)–based CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT FFR), derived from triple-rule-out coronary CT angiography for acute chest pain (ACP) in the emergency department (ED) setting. Materials and Methods AI-based CT FFR from triple-rule-out CT angiography data sets was retrospectively obtained in 159 of 271 eligible patients (102 men; mean age, 57.0 years ± 9.7 [standard deviation]) presenting to the ED with ACP. The agreement between CT FFR (≤ 0.80) and stenosis at triple-rule-out CT angiography (≥ 50%), as well as downstream cardiac diagnostic testing, was investigated. Furthermore, the predictive value of CT FFR for coronary revascularization and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was assessed over a 1-year follow-up period. Results CT FFR and triple-rule-out CT angiography demonstrated agreement in severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in 52% (82 of 159) of all cases. CT FFR of 0.80 and less served as a better predictor for coronary revascularization and MACE than stenosis of 50% and greater at triple-rule-out CT angiography (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.4, 8.2 vs odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.9, 5.3) (P < .01). In the subgroup of patients with additional noninvasive cardiac testing (94 of 159), there was higher agreement as to the presence or absence of significant disease with CT FFR (55%) than with coronary triple-rule-out CT angiography (47%) (P = .23). Conclusion CT FFR derived from triple-rule-out CT angiography was a better predictor for coronary revascularization and MACE and showed better agreement with additional diagnostic testing than triple-rule-out CT angiography. Therefore, CT FFR may improve the specificity in identifying patients with ACP with significant CAD in the ED setting and reduce unnecessary downstream testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute chest pain (n=159). AI-based CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT FFR) ≤ 0.80 vs. Stenosis ≥ 50% at triple-rule-out CT angiography was evaluated on Coronary revascularization and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.4-8.2, p=<.01). AI-based CT FFR ≤ 0.80 was a better predictor for coronary revascularization and major cardiovascular events than stenosis ≥ 50% at triple-rule-out CT angiography.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: