Key result
Higher non-HDL-C is linked to ~162% higher odds of carotid intraplaque neovascularization.
Why the study?
Evidence of the association between serum lipid profiles and carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) is still limited.
Do serum lipid profiles correlate with the presence of carotid intraplaque neovascularization in a high-stroke-risk population?
Cross-Sectional (n=250)
Do serum lipid profiles correlate with the presence of carotid intraplaque neovascularization in a high-stroke-risk population?
Higher levels of total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol are positively associated with the presence of carotid intraplaque neovascularization in patients at high risk for stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May link dyslipidemia to carotid plaque vulnerability; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
Background Evidence of the association between serum lipid profiles and intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) is still limited. We aimed to study the value of a novel Doppler method, superb microvascular imaging, in correlating serum lipid profiles and evidence of IPN in a population with a high risk of stroke. Methods and Results A community‐based cross‐sectional study was conducted in Beijing, China. Residents (aged ≥40 years) underwent questionnaire interviews, physical examinations, and laboratory testing in 2018 and 2019. Subjects with a high risk of stroke were then selected. Standard carotid ultrasound and carotid plaque superb microvascular imaging examinations were then performed on the high–stroke‐risk participants. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between serum lipid profiles and carotid plaque IPN. Overall, a total of 250 individuals (mean age, 67.20±8.12 years; 66.4% men) met the study inclusion criteria. Superb microvascular imaging revealed carotid plaque IPN in 96 subjects (38.4%). Subjects with IPN were more likely to be current smokers (34.0% versus 46.9%, P =0.046), and their identified carotid plaques were much thicker (2.35±0.63 mm versus 2.75±0.80 mm, P =0.001). Serum lipids, including total cholesterol, non–high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were positively associated with the presence of IPN (4.33±1.00 mmol/L versus 4.79±1.12 mmol/L, P =0.001; 2.96±0.92 mmol/L versus 3.40±1.01 mmol/L, P =0.001; 2.18±0.76 mmol/L versus 2.46±0.80 mmol/L, P =0.005, respectively), and after adjustment for other confounders, the positive relationship remained significant. Furthermore, non–high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (odds ratio, 2.62 [95% CI, 1.35–5.06]) was significantly associated with the presence of carotid plaque IPN even after adjusting for low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. Conclusions Total cholesterol, non–high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were positively associated with the presence of carotid IPN in a Chinese high–stroke‐risk population. Further prospective studies should be conducted to better understand how much finding IPN adds to current stroke prediction tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted a cross-sectional in High risk of stroke (n=250). Serum lipid profiles (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) was evaluated on Presence of carotid plaque intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.35-5.06). Higher non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly associated with the presence of carotid intraplaque neovascularization in a high-stroke-risk population (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.35-5.06).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: