Key result
Familial short stature with IGF-IR gene anomaly is characterized by low birth weight and height, a familial history of low birth weight, and normal or increased IGF-I levels and GH response.
Highlights the clinical features and criteria for investigating IGF-IR gene anomalies in patients with familial short stature and intrauterine/postnatal growth retardation.
IGF-IR anomalies merit consideration in familial short stature; leaves open standardized genetic evaluation protocols.
Type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR) is widely expressed across many cell types in fetal and postnatal tissues. The activation of this receptor after the binding of secreted IGF-I and IGF-II promotes cell differentiation and proliferation. IGF-IR has an important role in normal fetal and postnatal growth and development. IGF-IR gene anomalies presenting with intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation have recently been reported in some families. Familial short stature with IGF-IR gene anomaly is considered rare, and the clinical condition and features remain unknown. IGF-IR gene anomaly such as heterozygous IGF-IR mutation or haploinsufficiency of the IGF-IR gene should be investigated in those patients presenting with 1) low birth weight and birth height (< -1.5 SD), 2) a familial history of low birth weight, 3) a normal or increased IGF-I level, 4) a normal or increased GH response to the GH stimulation test, and/or 5) less response to GH treatment than common small for gestational age (SGA) short-stature patients. In this review, we provide an overview of current knowledge of familial short stature with IGF-IR gene anomaly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawashima et al. (2011) conducted a review in Familial short stature with IGF-IR gene anomaly. IGF-IR gene anomaly was evaluated. Familial short stature with IGF-IR gene anomaly is characterized by low birth weight and height, a familial history of low birth weight, and normal or increased IGF-I levels and GH response.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: