Key result
Apoe and Ldlr mouse models paired with Cre drivers exhibit distinct, outcome-altering off-target effects.
Why the study?
The rapid proliferation of Cre driver lines has made selection of appropriate cell-type-specific Cre mouse models for atherosclerosis increasingly challenging.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review provides a systematic framework for selecting appropriate background strains (Apoe vs. Ldlr knockout) and cell-type-specific Cre driver lines to minimize experimental confounding and improve translational validity in preclinical atherosclerosis research.
Atherosclerosis is a chronic vascular inflammatory disease, and mouse models are essential for studying its pathogenesis. The Cre/loxP technology has become the gold standard for cell-type-specific gene targeting. However, the rapid proliferation of Cre driver lines has made model selection increasingly challenging. In this review, we provide a practical guide to choosing appropriate Cre mouse models. We compare the two most common backgrounds ( Apoe and Ldlr knockout) in terms of lipid profiles, inflammatory dynamics, dietary dependence, and suitability for studying metabolic comorbidities to guide the selection of background strains, and systematically evaluate Cre models targeting all major cell types in atherosclerotic plaques (endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, T cells, B cells, fibroblasts, NKT cells, and platelets), as well as lipid metabolism, hematopoietic cells and emerging AAV-based approaches. We also compare conventional knockout with conditional and inducible systems, emphasizing critical considerations, including Cre toxicity, tamoxifen leakiness, and experimental controls. Finally, we discuss future directions such as dual-recombinase, lineage tracing, comorbidity modeling, single-cell technologies, and cross-species validation, to better align mouse models with human atherosclerosis. By clarifying how model choice influences experimental outcomes, this review aims to help researchers select optimal models and accelerate mechanistic and therapeutic discoveries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) conducted a review in Atherosclerosis (murine models). Cell-type-specific Cre/loxP gene targeting and AAV-based gene delivery vs. Conventional global knockout vs. conditional and inducible Cre-loxP systems; Apoe vs. Ldlr knockout backgrounds was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: