Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previous research has shown assortative mating across various psychiatric disorders; however, their definitions of partnership have often been limited, and the timing of relationship formation remains imprecise. This study aims to comprehensively examine assortative mating across the full spectrum of mental disorders, using population-wide register data from Finland that include information on the formation of both marriages and cohabiting unions. We used nationwide data on all cohabitations and marriages between 2000 and 2020 from the Finnish Population Register (n=1,271,242 partnerships). Broad and specific categories of mental disorder diagnoses were retrieved from both primary and secondary healthcare registers in Finland. We calculated tetrachoric correlations between partners' mental disorder diagnoses, considering only diagnoses received before the start of cohabitation or marriage. Assortative mating was observed across the full spectrum of mental disorders, with the strongest within-disorder correlations for schizophrenia, psychotic disorders, organic mental disorders, and intellectual disabilities (r > 0.50). Moderate correlations were found for mood and anxiety disorders. Adjusting for birth decade and excluding comorbidities slightly attenuated the associations but did not change the overall patterns. This study suggests that assortative mating is prevalent for mental disorders. Assortative mating may contribute to the transmission and clustering of mental disorders within families, highlighting the importance of considering partner selection in mental health research and policy-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golovina et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: