Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ebben, W.P., A.G. Kindler, K.A. Chirdon, N.C. Jenkins, A.J. Polichnowski, and A.V. Ng. The effect of high-load vs. high-repetition training on endurance performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 18(3):513–517. 2004.—The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of high-load (H-load) periodized resistance training and high-repetition (H-rep) reverse step loading periodized resistance training on endurance performance. Twenty-six female university rowers (age = 20 ± 1 year) were randomly assigned to H-load (5 novice, 8 varsity) or H-rep (7 novice, 6 varsity) groups. Subjects were pre- and posttested using a 2,000-m rowing ergometer test. Outcome variables included SymbolO2 peak, time to test completion, total power, average power per stroke, total number of strokes, stroke rate, and body mass. Subjects trained for 8 weeks using identical exercises. Varsity rowers who performed H-load training demonstrated greater improvement compared with those who performed H-rep training. Novice rowers who performed H-rep training demonstrated greater improvement compared with those who performed H-load training. High-load periodized training appears to be more effective for athletes with advanced training status, and H-rep reverse step loading periodized training is more effective for those who are relatively untrained.Symbol
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebben et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: