Key result
Pre-AF ablation cardiac CT reveals clinically significant incidental findings in ~24% of patients.
Why the study?
The prevalence and distribution of incidental cardiac computed tomography findings in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation were not well characterized.
What is the prevalence of incidental findings on cardiac computed tomography in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
Observational (n=218)
Yes
What is the prevalence of incidental findings on cardiac computed tomography in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
Cardiac computed tomography prior to atrial fibrillation ablation reveals clinically significant incidental findings in nearly 30% of patients, highlighting its potential secondary role as a screening tool.
Nearly one-quarter of pre-ablation CCTs show clinically significant incidental findings; leaves open whether systematic detection or workup alters long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective technique for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is a non-invasive imaging modality that is used as a crucial part of planning before CA procedures which can detect other incidental findings and require further diagnostic investigations. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the prevalence and distribution of incidental CCT findings in patients with AF undergoing CA. METHODS: Retrospective analysis over a three-year period (2013-2016) of 218 patients undergoing CCT prior to AF CA. CCT findings were analyzed and incident clinically important findings were reported. RESULTS: Over the three-year period, 218 patients had undergone CCT. Of these, 28.8% showed clinically significant incidental findings in the chest and upper abdomen. Incidental findings included coronary artery disease (CAD), incomplete cor triatriatum, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, pulmonary nodules, pulmonary infiltrates, pulmonary mass, thoracic aortic aneurysm, mediastinal nodes, abdominal mass, and liver nodules. CONCLUSIONS: CCT is a cornerstone investigation prior to AF CA and can show multiple incidental findings, thus potentially functioning as a screening method for the detection of other significant conditions. There is still a debate whether further workup is needed or not as most findings will eventually be benign and further investigations could mean financial burden and clinical risks to the patients. Further larger prospective studies are needed with long-term follow-up to determine whether incidental findings on CCT have an impact on the long-term outcomes of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamed et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=218). Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography was evaluated on Prevalence of clinically significant incidental findings in the chest and upper abdomen. Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography prior to atrial fibrillation catheter ablation revealed clinically significant incidental findings in the chest and upper abdomen in 23.85% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: