Key result
HbA1c concentration changes slowly, requiring 16 weeks to determine a critically increased level, indicating that 23% of measurements taken sooner than 16 weeks could be cancelled.
Why the study?
What is the optimal frequency for repeating HbA1c measurements based on its rate of change?
Observational (n=52,017)
What is the optimal frequency for repeating HbA1c measurements based on its rate of change?
Repeating HbA1c measurements sooner than 16 weeks to detect increases is often unnecessary, and optimizing measurement frequency could reduce unnecessary testing by 23%.
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a long-term measure for glucose concentration in plasma. Since its introduction as a diabetes monitoring tool, and its more recent application as a diagnostic tool, the number of measurements of HbA1c have risen dramatically. However, HbA1c change is slow, so repeating measurements should not be done too often. We use a large, unfiltered dataset from 52,017 patients to determine the possible rate of change in HbA1c concentration. In our laboratory, the critical difference between HbA1c measurements is 8.5%. Our data show that a 1-unit HbA1c rise takes 4 weeks to occur, hence, at a HbA1c concentration around 50 mmol/mol Hgb, a critically increased HbA1c concentration cannot be determined until after 16 weeks. Conversely a critically lower HbA1c can manifest itself after 2 weeks, but after 7 weeks the dropping tendency stops. The amount of measurements that can be cancelled because they were taken sooner than 16 weeks is 23 percent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munk et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing HbA1c measurement (n=52,017). Time between HbA1c measurements was evaluated on Rate of change in HbA1c concentration. HbA1c concentration changes slowly, requiring 16 weeks to determine a critically increased level, indicating that 23% of measurements taken sooner than 16 weeks could be cancelled.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: