Key result
Surgical LAAO cuts embolic events ~37% compared to no occlusion during cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
The safety and efficacy of surgical left atrial appendage occlusion during concomitant cardiac surgery were not well established.
Does surgical left atrial appendage occlusion reduce embolic events and stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=40,107)
Does surgical left atrial appendage occlusion reduce embolic events and stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Odds Ratio: 0.63 (95% CI 0.53–0.76)
p-value: p=<0.001
Concomitant surgical left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery significantly reduces the risk of embolic events and stroke, particularly in patients with atrial fibrillation, without increasing adverse events.
Supports surgical LAAO consideration during cardiac surgery for stroke reduction; reinforces pooled evidence for guideline integration.
AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (s-LAAO) during concomitant cardiac surgery. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search through May 31st 2018 for all eligible studies comparing s-LAAO vs no occlusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Clinical outcomes during follow-up included: embolic events, stroke, all-cause mortality, atrial fibrillation (AF), reoperation for bleeding and postoperative complications. We further stratified the analysis based on propensity matched studies and AF predominance. RESULTS: Twelve studies (n = 40107) met the inclusion criteria. s-LAAO was associated with lower risk of embolic events (OR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.53-0.76; P < 0.001) and stroke (OR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.57-0.82; P < 0.0001). Stratified analysis demonstrated this association was more prominent in the AF predominant strata. There was no significant difference in the incidence risk of all-cause mortality, AF, and reoperation for bleeding and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Concomitant s-LAAO during cardiac surgery was associated with lower risk of follow-up thromboembolic events and stroke, especially in those with AF without significant increase in adverse events. Further randomized trials to evaluate long-term benefits of s-LAAO are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atti et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis in cardiac surgery (n=40,107). Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (s-LAAO) vs. no occlusion was evaluated on embolic events (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.76, p=<0.001). Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery was associated with a lower risk of embolic events (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.53-0.76; P<0.001) and stroke compared to no occlusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: