Key result
Azilsartan medoxomil demonstrates long-term tolerability in hypertension, with adverse events in ~76% of patients.
Why the study?
The long-term safety and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil in essential hypertension using a treat-to-target approach with thiazide-type diuretics required evaluation.
Is azilsartan medoxomil safe and well-tolerated in subjects with essential hypertension?
Cohort (n=669)
Open-label
Non-randomized
Is azilsartan medoxomil safe and well-tolerated in subjects with essential hypertension?
Azilsartan medoxomil is well tolerated over 56 weeks and provides stable blood pressure improvements when used in a treat-to-target approach with thiazide-type diuretics.
Supports long-term tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil with diuretics; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of sustained BP effects.
This 56-week phase 3, open-label, treat-to-target study, involving 2 consecutive, non-randomized cohorts, evaluated the safety and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) in essential hypertension (mean baseline blood pressure [BP] 152/100 mmHg). All subjects (n = 669) initiated AZL-M 40 mg QD, force-titrated to 80 mg QD at week 4, if tolerated. From week 8, subjects could receive additional medications, starting with chlorthalidone (CLD) 25 mg QD (Cohort 1) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-25 mg QD (Cohort 2), if required, to reach BP targets. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 75.9% of subjects overall in the two cohorts (73.8% Cohort 1, 78.5% Cohort 2). The most common AEs were dizziness (14.3%), headache (9.9%) and fatigue (7.2%). Transient serum creatinine elevations were more frequent with add-on CLD. Clinic systolic/diastolic BP (observed cases at week 56) decreased by 25.2/18.4 mmHg (Cohort 1) and 24.2/17.9 mmHg (Cohort 2). These results demonstrate that AZL-M is well tolerated over the long term and provides stable BP improvements when used in a treat-to-target BP approach with thiazide-type diuretics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Handley et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Essential hypertension (n=669). Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) was evaluated on Adverse events (AEs).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: