Key result
CRT device-related infections reach ~7%, revealing substantial underreporting in national registries.
Why the study?
The prevalence of device related infections for cardiac resynchronization therapy in clinical practice is hypothesized to be higher than previously reported and underreported in national registries.
What is the prevalence and what are the risk factors for device-related infections in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy in routine clinical practice?
Observational (n=171)
No
What is the prevalence and what are the risk factors for device-related infections in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy in routine clinical practice?
The real-world prevalence of CRT device infections and complications is significantly higher than reported in national registries, highlighting a major issue with underreporting and the need for automated surveillance.
CRT infection rates likely exceed registry figures; challenges reliance on administrative data and leaves open accurate incidence via prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: The implantation rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices have steadily increased, accompanied by a steeper rise of device related infections (DRI). HYPOTHESIS: The prevalence of DRI for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is higher in clinical practice than reported previously, even at a university hospital, and likely higher than reported to the national device registry. METHODS: Electronic medical records of consecutive patients undergoing a CRT procedure between January 2016 and December 2017 were analyzed. Clinical history, procedure related variables and complications were reviewed by specialists in cardiology and infectious diseases. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients, mean aged 74 years, 138 males (80.7%) were included. Twelve DRI occurred in 10 patients during mean 2.5 years follow-up, giving a prevalence of 7% (incidence of 29/1000 person-years). Reoperation, pocket haematoma, ≥3 procedures, previous device infection and indwelling central venous line were the strongest predictive factors according to univariate analysis. Out of 63/171 (36.8%) major complications, 31(49.2%) were lead-related. There were 49/171 (28.7%) reoperations and 15/171 (8.8%) minor complications. The number major complications and DRI reported to the national device registry were 7/171 (4.1%) and 2/171 (0.6%), respectively, reflecting a 5-fold underreporting. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of CRT device infections is in sharp contrast to those reported by others and to the national device registry. Although a center specific explanation cannot be excluded, the high rates highlight a major issue with registries, reinforcing the need for better surveillance and automatic reporting of device related complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ostrowska et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=171). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was evaluated on Device related infections (DRI). Among patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy, the prevalence of device-related infections was 7%, reflecting a 5-fold underreporting to the national device registry.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: