Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The link between the timing of settlement (transition froni the pelagic to the benthic environment) and the formation of the 'settlement-mark' in fish otohths was examined in order to validate the use of this microstructural feature for the back-calculation of settlement patterns and planktonic larval durations.The formation of the settlement-mark was validated to occur at settlement in 2 pomacentrids, Polnacentrus amhojnensis, P nagasakiensis, and less conclusively in 13 other species from 7 families.Within these species, 3 dlstlnct settlement-mark durations were identified: a single-increment mark (P.amhoinensis, P, nagasak~enslsl, a 2-increment mark (l? coelestjs); and a zondl.14-increment mark (Acanthurus sp. 2, probably A. blochi).The structure of settlement-marks for P. amboinensis and P. nagasakjensis were compared among 4 to 5 locations on t h r northern Great Barrler Reel, Australia (maximum of 20 km apart).Otolith increment profiles diffcrcd minimally over spatial scctles of 20 km in these species, with Lizard Island tlsh possessing ~n c r e m r n t profiles diflcrent to those from other locations.This pattern of minimal variation in profiles occurred despitc the fcact that the planktonic larval duration of one species ( P n~lgssaklcwsis) dlffered among locat~ons (range of mean values: 22.4 to 26.3 d ) Further, at Lizard Island, increment profiles of P. ambo~nensis showed stat~stically s~gnificant, although minor, differences among local populations around the ~s l a n d and between successive lunar recruit cohorts.Our evidence suggests that the structure of thc increment transitions associated with settlement are taxon specific, although the optical contrast of settlement-marks (determined by increment width) may show subtle spatial and temporal variation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: